Monday, 11 March 2013

The Good, the Bad and Chelsea Football Club


Bad guys rarely know that is what they are. It is only with the benefit of hindsight that the moral arbiters can assign them their status; history is written by the winners, said Churchill, and those winners are very rarely labelled ‘bad’. Good and bad are the most subjective, even nonsensical of concepts in some ways. Where one man may ardently pursue an ideology he sees as right, another may view him as morally misguided, even evil. So I write this article today with a caveat. The following conjecture is just that; the opinion and moralising of one man, who may himself inadvertently be the bad guy in the tale he is about to unfold. Yet, that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be said. “All that it takes for evil to triumph is for a few good men to do nothing”, said someone, perhaps Andy Townsend. And while Chelsea are far from evil, and their fans far from bad, it is surely time to confront head on a club spiralling away from an illustrious history into a place only a few clubs can claim experience: near-universal disdain.

I don’t want this to be a hatchet job, so let me first clarify something about Chelsea. They did not ‘begin’ in 2003, with the ascent of Abramovich. This is the favoured line of the self-important armchair critic, smiling a snide smile as he suggests you can’t buy history. Well obviously you can’t buy history you smug prick, but you also don’t define history by trophies alone. Notts County are the oldest still-extant professional football club in the World. They are suffused by history; a shining embodiment of our footballing heritage in this country. Juventus, the grand old lady of Turin, based their stripes on those of County, an honour that needs little elaboration. Yet according to the smirking twitter pundit County would have no history because they’ve never won the Champions League. They’ve never even been in the Premier League, which of course was the founding point of football in 1992. Of course this is nonsense. Dominance does not equal history, or else only Liverpool, United, Arsenal and maybe Huddersfield Town (really), would be deemed worthy of the title. Chelsea have a past bathed in glory, struggle and occasional mediocrity, just as every other football league club does. Except MK Dons.

So it is not out of spite that I attack the Blues. It is nothing to do with their perceived lack of a place at the clique-ish, arrogant top table of English football. They deserve their seat. I roared last year when, fuelled by solidarity and grit, they somehow overcame Barcelona, triumphing as a team against a side which had for years been the very embodiment of teamwork. I have no reason to dislike them any more than I would any rival of my team’s, especially given the magnificence of their travails against the odds last season. It is not because of history that I think Chelsea are the bad guys, nor because of their financial supremacy. It is because of their present and, more worryingly, what it suggests about their future.

Rafa Benitez is a phenomenal manager. He broke the La Liga monopoly of the Clasico giants with his Valencia side. Twice. He drove his team to Uefa Cup glory, back when that meant something. He then took over a Liverpool side mired in mediocrity and breathed new life into them, driving them to the Champions League title, against all odds. To confound those who said it was a fluke, he then steered the Reds back to the final just two years later, where they were only undone by the last throes of a majestic AC Milan side. He even dared challenge the superpowers of English football, and though he never quite crossed the finish line first, he left an indelible mark on the domestic game. For those who deride him as a tinkerman, I point to that night in Istanbul. He was wrong to leave out Didi Hamann, but so right to bring him on early. His willingness to shuffle his team is a sign of humility, unlike the obstinate arrogance of his peers. If he hadn’t admitted his mistake and drafted in the German Liverpool would never have won that game. He did the same against United on Sunday, from a position in which few, if any, managers could have recovered. His tinkering is to be admired. He also, despite popular belief, never suggested he would refuse to countenance the idea of managing Chelsea; an urban myth invented by a 15 year old on twitter and swallowed whole by a lazy press corps. He left Liverpool and then took over another strong side, who are in no way geographical or ancient rivals. For this he was castigated, threatened and mocked to the rafters of Stamford Bridge. That is nothing short of a disgrace.

He is booed every time he stands. His every utterance is met by a chorus of expletives and hate. He is derided for his looks, dismissed for comments he never said and chastised for the crime of not being Jose Mourinho. Yes, Chelsea are not as strong as they were 3 years ago. That is not Benitez’s fault. He has inherited a club in limbo, unable to buy his own players or even stamp his own authority on a team, it has been made clear, he will manage only for the short term. Despite this he has shown a willingness to fight, a passion to leave the club in as strong a position as possible. They still boo him. When Manchester United dismantled one great team and built another they didn’t win anything for several years. Chelsea fans cannot stomach the same, so dizzy on rapid success they have become. Whereas Keane, Stam and Van Nistelrooy were dispatched once it became clear they were poisonous to the dressing room, the cartel of Terry, Lampard and Cole remains. They are good players, and Lampard is not a bad man, but to welcome the new you must say goodbye to the old. Chelsea fans cannot accept this; demanding the two live alongside in some uneasy marriage. The results of this lopsided rebuilding are evident for all to see.

Instead they turn their bile on a man who does not deserve it. I will defend to the death the right to a say in a football club’s direction for fans, but does that extend the hostility Chelsea have shown? Is it helpful to meet every poor game with a chorus of boos soaked up as much by the playing staff as by the coach? There were even whispers of some hoping for occasional defeats to hasten the departure of the scapegoat upon whom they have heaved all their ills. That is an attitude I cannot stomach. Just as Blackburn Rovers disgraced themselves with their near death-threats for poor Steve Kean last season, Chelsea have done the same this term. When Benitez had had enough he responded, not in the meltdown the press described it as but rather in an eminently sensible, passionate defence of his role at a club that had done its best to undermine him from the very moment he attempted to come to its aid. The booed him twice as hard after that. These are the same fans who booed Anton Ferdinand for the temerity of being racially abused by their great John Terry. When a core of fans, however small in the grand mass, have the attitude that Ferdinand is at fault for taking offence at the vile spewings of their captain then there is little that can be said. They are bad guys, blinded by something bordering on obsession for the old guard and their ways and rank, ignorant hostility for anyone attempting to take the club in a different direction.

I’m not going to dwell on Terry. He is an odious individual, but I understand that admiration for his strength on the field and symbolic embodiment of the club cloud the judgement of Chelsea fans, just as the Kop loves Suarez and Stretford End still defends Keane’s assault on Alf-Inge Haaland. What sets Chelsea fans apart is this bile for Benitez: a good man, trying to help their club and being met with 45,000 middle fingers. Along with Abramovich’s whims, Chelsea fans have succeeded in making it a job fewer and fewer people will take up. Guardiola is gone, Jurgen Klopp will never consider it and the brightest young talent in European management has already been dispatched to White Hart Lane. Maybe Mourinho will return. I hope he succeeds. Because if he fails, Chelsea fans will be left with a burning hatred for the new alongside their love of a past which no longer exists. They will write a new passage of mediocrity in the history of a grand old club that deserves so much better. I doubt they will care much of my criticism, and maybe rightly so. But it pains me to see a side that has done so much right, capped by the staggering unity they showed at the end of last season, undone by so much wrong.



No comments:

Post a Comment